Thursday, 24 May 2012

Investigative Journalism

Lecture 10
Second last lecture! At least I think so. There may or may not be a lecture next week. We'll see right?
So this week we discussed (I say discussed, but really it was just Bruce talking and us trying to follow) investigative journalism.
When I first signed up for my courses at the start of the year, I noticed that one our subjects for semester two was investigative journalism. At first, I thought it was SO cool.  I thought we were going to go all 21 Jump Street on Brisbane and become undercover journalists or something. But then... uni started.
Don't get me wrong, I love journalism. Definately no doubt in my mind that I will be doing some form of writer as my official 'profession'. However, I do find having to call people I don't know (and asking them a bunch of personal questions) intimidating. Before I spent a year overseas, I was painfully shy. And that isn't an exaggeration, either, because my stomach would literally hurt whenever people outside of my small friend circle made contact with me. Even though I've definately overcome that, it came from a need for survival, not a need to know everything.
So yes, I'm a little daunted by the thought of journalistic investigation and let's just say; this lecture did not help me overcome my fears one single bit.
The following is what I learnt from my lecture (cue everyone exiting this browser...):
  • it's aim is to uncover the truth and identify lapses from it
  • the best stories are always the ones people want to supress
  • it provides a voice for people who don't have one in society
  • it takes nothing for granted (be sceptical, not cynical!)
  • always check facts!
  • assume nothing!
  • expect whistleblowers to be/go crazy!
  • interview, observe, search documents, go to briefings, check for leaks and (depending on your level of morality) sometimes trespass and steal evidence. Hey, I'm just saying what they told us.
  • ask yourself this: does everything line up?
And then you have a story! Easy peasy. Maybe.
We were shown a few examples of investigative journalists who changed the world and, I'll admit, I was definately curious. I looked up "investigave journalism" and had a look at what popped up on good ol' Google. This is an example I found:
"Anna Politkovskaya's reporting in Chechnya and the Russian treatment of the Chechen people led to many investigative reports published in Novaya Gazeta, such as the poisoning of children. Her work was widely recognized by international organizations before she was murdered in 2006. Today an award in her name honors other women who report under circumstances of great danger."
Thanks, Wikipedia. I now know which job I definately won't be chasing.

On the plus side, here's a video of a sheep pushing a fisherman into a lake:
http://www.break.com/index/sheep-attacks-unsuspecting-fisherman-2327209

Until next time,
Leila

Annotated Bibliography

Racism in the Media: Hurricane Katrina

Coleman, R. 2003, "Race and ethical reasoning: The importance of race to journalistic decision making", Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 295-310. 

The author, Renita Coleman, is an Associate Professor at the University of Texas' School of Journalism with a B.A., M.S. and Ph.D. in Journalism (Coleman, R. 2012). Her academic achievements assures credibility in regards to the importance of ethical reasoning to journalistic decision making. In the article, Coleman gives possible explanations behind ethical reasoning, focusing principally on the prejudice against African Americans. Citing the schema theory as the main reason behind race perceptions, the article describes an experiment conducted in which participants were judged on their ethical reasoning (Coleman, R. 2003). Coleman's hypothesis revolves around the theory that a journalist's racial schemes will lead them to make poorer ethical decisions when African Americans are involved, as opposed to Caucasians. The participants, made up of journalist majors at a prominent university, were to judge whether a photo should be released based on content and social issues presented. The race of the subjects in the photographs were altered using technology in order to test Coleman's hypothesis (Coleman, R. 2003). The results were displayed in a table format at the conclusion of the article. Coleman deducted that the study supported her hypothesis as participants showed lower standards of ethical reasoning when the subjects were African American.


Solnit, R. 2009. Four years on, Katrina remains cursed by rumour, cliche, lies and racism, The Guardian. Retrieved from: <http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/aug/26/katrina-racism-us-media>

Rebecca Solnit, the writer of this article, has published 13 non-fiction books and prides herself in being an activist and cultural historian. As an editor for Harper's and a frequent writer for political website Tomdispatch.com, Solnit has gained a reputation as hard and just and was named a 'visionary' by Utne Reader Magazine (Solnit, R. 2012). She opens the article with the current racial issue surrounding President Barack Obama's birthplace, but quickly moves on to the issue of racism during Hurricane Katrina in 2005. She describes the racist representation of African American in the media, giving the example that they were often presented as criminals (Solnit, R. 2009). Solnit then goes on to describe the impact this media representation had on the worldwide perception of New Orleans, explaining that it was seen as a prison city and hostile land. This leads us to believe that a lower level of ethical reasoning was used in the writing of this article. The main point expressed throughout the article is that Hurricane Katrina transitioned into a social catastrophe as bad decisions were made by the people in power and rumours were spread by the media. After quick examples of racial prosecution and a summary of the violence during the hurricane (Solnit, R. 2009), Solnit concludes the piece with warnings of natural disasters to come and a question as to how man will act when those storms come.

Jones, V. 2005. Black People "Loot" Food … White People "Find" Food. Huffington Post. Retrieved from: <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/van-jones/black-people-loot-food-wh_b_6614.html>
The author of this short article, Van Jones, has been named by Times Magazine as one of the top 100 influential people in the world. He is the founding president of Rebuild the Dream, as well as being the co-founder of three other successful organizations, including the Ella Baker Center for Human Rights (Jones, V. 2012). These attribute lead him to be a very credible source. Jones begins by stating that Hurricane Katrina has brought out the worst in the media, referring to black people being presented as looters as an example. He compares the way the media has portrayed white people as opposed to black people, specifically saying that white people are seen in a more positive light and displayed as "survivors" whereas black people, who have a very negative image, are branded "criminals" (Jones, V. 2005). The main focus of the article revolves around two separate pictures from yahoo.com with similar actions being presented. One photo, showing white people, is positive, while the other, the focus of this picture being black people, is negative. These photos are a clear example of poor ethical reasoning in relation to race. In his conclusion, he links the bias of these representations to the reason why countries are often divided (Jones, V. 2005).

Rubio, T. 2005. Katrina Uncovers: Activism, Racism and Environmental Justice. National Radio Project. Retrieved from: <http://www.radioproject.org/2005/09/katrina-uncovers-activism-racism-and-environmental-justice/>

International Media Project, the organization behind this radio broadcast, is known for its commitment to journalistic investigation and in-depth analysis. They have been recognized as excellent journalists around the world and have received many different awards for this reason (Law, P. 2012). This leads them to be a credible source for information and a positive light in the media industry. The 29-minute segment starts with a description of the situation in New Orleans after the hurricane, in particular the mistreatment of survivors by the people in power. The first person interviewed in Van Jones, founder of the Ella Baker Center, who expresses his hope for immediate charitable and political action. He discusses human contact and briefly touches on the subject of ethnic groups in the area (Rubio, T. 2005). The second interviewee, Curtis Muhammad, the Director for Community Labor United, briefly discusses plans on redeveloping the city before delving into the topic of racism at 15:54. He expresses anger towards the government and their lack of support, using the comparison of the World Trade Center, and the immediate aid they received, to boost his argument (Rubio, T. 2005). The last speaker, Dr Craig Colten, is a professor at Louisiana State University. He discusses environmental justice and the rebuilding of New Orleans before presenting his concerns for the misconceptions in media coverage in regards to Hurricane Katrina at 24:40. He cites the notion that certain ethnic groups are unwilling to move as incorrect and states that other ethnic groups, giving the examples of Asians and Hispanics, have been ignored by the media throughout the ordeal (Rubio, T. 2005). The prejudice presented by the media in this fashion leads us to believe a lower level of ethical reasoning was used on people of these races. To conclude the piece, the song "George Bush doesn't care about black people" by The Legendary K.O. is played.

Reference List:
  • Coleman, R. 2003, "Race and ethical reasoning: The importance of race to journalistic decision making", Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 295-310. 
  • Coleman, R. 2012, Renita Coleman, School of Journalism, The University of Texas at Austin. Retrieved from: <http://journalism.utexas.edu/faculty/renita-coleman>
  • Jones, V. 2005. Black People "Loot" Food … White People "Find" Food. Huffington Post. Retrieved from: <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/van-jones/black-people-loot-food-wh_b_6614.html>
  • Jones, V. 2012. Van Jones. Huffington Post. Retrieved from: <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/van-jones>
  • Law, P. 2012. About Us, National Radio Project. Retrieved from: <http://www.radioproject.org/aboutus/>
  • Rubio, T. 2005. Katrina Uncovers: Activism, Racism and Environmental Justice. National Radio Project. Retrieved from: <http://www.radioproject.org/2005/09/katrina-uncovers-activism-racism-and-environmental-justice/>
  • Solnit, R. 2012. Bio, Rebecca Solnit. Retrieved from: <http://www.rebeccasolnit.com/bio>
  • Solnit, R. 2009. Four years on, Katrina remains cursed by rumour, cliche, lies and racism, The Guardian. Retrieved from: <http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/aug/26/katrina-racism-us-media>

Thursday, 17 May 2012

Apologies & Agendas

I think we've all gathered by now that I fail terribly at keeping promises. So I have decided that from here on out, I will no longer promise anything (apart from, you know, my promise not to keep promises. Following?). Who knows, maybe the spontaneity of my posts will keep people on their toes and... yeah, I've got nothing. Let's just see what happens, shall we?

Lecture 9
"The press may not be successful much of the time in telling people what to think, but it is stunningly successful in telling its readers what to think about" - Bernard Cohen


This week's lecture was all about the confusion between reality and the media's version of reality. The media's job is to present us with facts on issues from all around the world. However, newspapers almost always have an agenda spurring their articles.
We learnt about the four following types:

  1. Public Agenda
  2. Policy Agenda
  3. Corporate Agenda
  4. Media Agenda
They're all pretty self-explanatory. Throughout the lecture I noticed that one thing in particular was repeated over and over, and can sum up the lecture very neatly: the more coverage a story receives, the more important it is deemed by the public.Not only that, but journalists filter and shape reality in order for their story to fit perfectly.
Another major part of our lecture focused on the Agenda Setting Family:
  1. Media Gatekeeping (individual control of stories and their release)
  2. Media Advocacy (purposeful promotions)
  3. Agenda Cutting (serious issues taking a backseat to minor stories - e.g. Brangelina's wedding)
  4. Agenda Surfing (stories that follow the crows - e.g. KONY)
  5. Diffusion of News (how, where & when a story is released)
  6. Portrayal of an issue (e.g. Muslims and Aboriginals)
  7. Media Dependence (more dependence = more susceptibility)
As effective as this system may seem, it doesn't always work. People can be ignorant of details and therefore brush stories aside.Sometimes, a large group have already made up their mind about a certain subject and that would therefore weaken the impact. Also, as much as some journalist would love it to be true, we cannot create problems, nor can we conceal them. 
Here's an article I found from last year, talking about Julia Gillard and some of the political action she's taken and how how agenda has affected those stories:



The lecture on agenda setting was one of our last. You'd think that after all these weeks, that we would get bored of lectures on various journalism aspects, but apparently there's a lot to learn and it's all good stuff. 

And for the few people who have told me I disappointed them (not sure whether you were joking or not, actually), here's something to cheer you up:

http://www.facebook.com/pages/If-youre-feeling-down-heres-a-picture-of-a-shaved-llama/212205482177637

Until next time!

Thursday, 10 May 2012

"Do you wanna see me cry right now?"

You don't have to know me well to know I'm a massive fan of the Hunger Games. So when my sister showed me the following video (sorry, couldn't figure out how to embed it so it's just a link), I thought it was cruel yet hilarious at the same time.


I can only imagine how frustrated I would be if someone tried to pull that on me, so watching it done to other people is, admittedly, quite satisfying. 

p.s. I've now posted 3 times in the same week! Who's proud? I am!

Let's start again, shall we?

Okay, so now that I've been assured that we can post about whatever we want by my tutor (hi, Carmel!), I've decided to share some of my all time favourite YouTube videos with you all because I want each and every one of you to laugh as much as I did. Because I am hopelessly slack at posting blogs, I want to try and post one video a day. Enjoy!

First, let's start with the best of the best: "My Daughter Has Chosen The Dark Side"


It's not even her evil laugh that makes this video awesome, but the innocent look she gives at the end.

Tuesday, 8 May 2012

Big Questions

So much for improving my habits! Procrastination has once again taken its toll and I am now far behind in uni work. Now, yet again, I have to write two lecture posts in one and hope that I can catch up on all the rest. Don't worry, I'm mentally hitting myself, too.


Lecture 8
This weeks lecture brought about a brand new perspective to me. I'd always known journalism and photojournalism were hard jobs mentally, morally and sometimes physically. But this week, I was faced with most journalists' biggest internal debate: ethics.
We were shown 10 different advertisements and were told to write down whether we thought they were ethical or not and in good taste or just plain tacky. There were plays on words and on images. There were confronting scenes, offending sayings and moments that just made you shake your head.
Everyone has a different sense of right and wrong, so who decides whether an ad should be allowed to air or if it should be disgraced and never be viewed by the public? They get it wrong sometimes, too. Take the infamous "Where the bloody hell are you?" ad starring one of my least favourite people, Lara Bingle. Australian tourist companies spent thousands upon thousands of dollars creating this short television commercial promoting Australia for foreign countries, only to have it thrown back in their face. The ad was banned in the UK because of the word 'bloody' (though I might mention here that Ron Weasley uses the word 'bloody' far too often to be offensive to everyday Brits).
It all depends, surprise surprise, on who you work for. Different work places have a different code of ethics, most of them revolving around one of these three ideas:

  1. Deontology - following rules, principles and duties. 
  2. Consequentialism - getting a 'good' or 'right' outcome, no matter the means of achieving it. Or
  3. Virtue - 'goodness' that comes from habits or dispositions of character.
Something that made an impact on me during this lecture, was when Bruce said, "ethics is rarely a choice between absolute right and absolute wrong, but choosing the lesser of two evils."
In our tutorial yesterday, we were shown examples of photojournalism where the photographer chose to capture a moment instead of helping it. The most famous of these being, of course, Kevin Carter's picture in the Sudan:


This young girl was unable to reach the food station not too far away and was being circle by a vulture. Even though he scared the vulture away after taking the photo, he did not help the girl because he was under strict instructions not to touch any of the people there. Carter was harshly criticized for this moment, and ended up taking his life a year later due to the pressure. 
It's the biggest question any of us will have to face, and we won't all choose right.

Lecture 9
On a lighter note! The week that followed, we discussed news values and what you need to write a good story. Millions of events happened everyday. Out of those, only a tiny portion will be seen as potential news stories, and only a fraction of those will actually be published. The four greatest factors to any story are the following:
  1. Impact,
  2. Audience Identification,
  3. Pragmatics, and
  4. Source Influence.
News Values are not the same across every country and every news service. There is a long list of factors that a news company may value. For example:
  • negativity
  • proximity
  • recency
  • currency
  • continuity
  • uniqueness
  • simplicity
  • personality
  • expectedness
  • elite nations or people
  • exculsivity
  • size
  • visual attractiveness
  • entertainment
  • importance
  • weight
  • controversial
  • emotional
  • usefulness
  • educational value
  • good news
  • bad news
  • celebrity
  • follow-up
  • newspaper agenda
It may seem like a long list, but these are only a few of the possible values deemed important by different news services. Mix a few of them up and BAM! you've got a news story. 

That's all folks, hopefully I'll get my head together and post something else soon. Until next time!